go-resources/project_structure.md

2.3 KiB

Project Structure

One of Go's strength's is its simplicity. Project structure should be kept simple as well.

A Common Misconception

Although the golang-standards/project-layout repo looks official (23k+ stars, "golang" in the name, etc), it is not. Russ Cox, a principal engineer at Google and the most active contributor to Go has opened an issue to address this.

How Complex is Your Project?

On the complex end of the spectrum, projects like CockroachDB and Kubernetes use a complex project structure. gorilla/mux is comparatively simple. It has no dependencies and has no directory structure. Here are complexity scores for these 3 projects, and a few others, using scc:

Project Lines in .go Files Complexity score
Kubernetes 4,913,049 524,227
CockroachDB 4,064,838 725,465
gitea 223,761 39,001
hugo 148,613 16,642
go-github 117,131 15,637
traefik 107,542 9,154
gio 47,283 5,122
gorilla/mux 6,661 763

The complexity scores are rough estimates, but are useful in realizing how complex your code is. Creating project structure is not a pure science. There is an art to knowing how to lay out a project based on its current state, and its trajectory.

If your project is simple, do not add unnecessary structure. This increases the cognitive load of anyone trying to use the project.

Package internal

Package pkg

Use Encapsulation Tools to Create Project Structure

Just as structs, funcs, files, packages, and modules are

Adding Complexity Should be Justified

Use Other Methods of Abstraction

Other Resources